In article
<OUT-50F5C18E.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk>,
Chris Young <chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm not sure I necessarily agree with this workaround - a website
> deciding that everything running ARM must want the mobile version of a
> page is making a pretty big assumption
I decided there was no good reason for leaking processor architecture
information anyway.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
No comments:
Post a Comment