Monday, 2 April 2012

Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu 0.8.9 and RO 5.19

On 12 Mar 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
> In message <4145596f52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
> Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

[snip]

> > Here, RPCEmu 0.8.9/RO 4.39 and RPCEmu 0.8.9/RO 5.19 run on the same
> > Vista host, but not at the same time. Each connects to the same
> > bridge (which survives a Vista re-boot). Both versions can access
> > the internet, and can share files with the RiscPC, on the same
> > network, using ShareFS. I can see no difference between 4.39 and
> > 5.19, in regard to networking.
> >
> > However, within the last few days, I've discovered a problem with a
> > newly acquired copy of LanMan98. I can copy files from the Vista C
> > drive to the RiscPC, but not vice-versa (time-out and the file left
> > open). For now, I'm assuming that there is some elusive write-
> > permission which needs to be set in Vista - and hoping that it is
> > not a symptom of any general problem, as described by Dave.
> >
> > Does anyone know of any compatibility issues relating to RPCEmu and
> > LanMan98?
>
> LanMan98 works fine on my setup (see snipped post above). I think your
> theory re sharing permission in Vista is probably right. I have a
> network-shared folder on the PC here, and I found that: (1) enabling
> sharing on the Windows side and (2) exact syntax concerning the share
> identity was critical (i.e. if LanMan98 thought the folder was being
> shared with 'Guest' it was no good selecting 'Everyone' on the Windows
> sharing side; 'Guest' had to be created/selected in Windows or the
> LanMan98 setup altered to 'Everyone'). Given that, it seems very
> reliable here (touches wood).

Sorry for the delayed response.

Since my earlier post, I have ditched Vista, and upgraded to Windows 7
Home Premium 32 bit. I'm pleased to confirm that RPCEmu 0.8.9/RO 4.39
and RPCEmu 0.8.9/RO 5.19 continue to run. For both installations
networking is available, and the internet is accessible.

However, there is a problem with ShareFS, in that the RiscPC is not
visible from either RPCEmu, but either RPCEmu is visible from the
RiscPC, and files can be moved in both directions. I suspect that this
has to do with Win7 permissions, with which I am still struggling!
Likewise LanMan98.

In the course of rebuilding the network bridge I discovered that OpenVPN
version 2.2.2 http://openvpn.net/index.php/open-source/downloads.html is
now available, and that one of the changes listed, is a bug fix in the
Windows TAP-driver.

For me, OpenVPN 2.2.2 results in a stable network bridge, which survives
Windows re-boot. Anyone who has experienced problems with the network
bridge, may wish to try the new version of OpenVPN.

Tony


_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu

No comments:

Post a Comment