On 30/04/2012 10:00, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> We have considered plenty of DVCSs over the years. I've been pushing for a
> move from Subversion for the past four or five years. Until recently, the pain
> of the move outweighed the pain of staying, but nowadays it's too painful to
> stay. Git "won" the argument in the end because it's the one DVCS the majority
> of us are familiar (if not comfortable) with. It has a lot of good
> documentation out there, and while its UI sucks (to say the least) it is
> competently implemented and UI can be improved.
<troll>
Tried fossil <http://www.fossil-scm.org/>? :D
</troll>
François.
No comments:
Post a Comment