Friday, 23 May 2014

Re: [gccsdk] Recommended autobuilder/packages/etc distros

In message <540c7aec44chrisg@care4free.net>
Chris Gransden <chrisg@care4free.net> wrote:

> The problem with standardising on 'stable' is what happens when the curent
> 'testing' becomes 'stable'. A whole load of packages will then need
> updating. It's easier to keep them up to date gradually instead of all in
> one hit.
>

That would be true if 'testing' was left empty at change over, but wont
it be replaced from newer versions from the old 'unstable'?

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

No comments:

Post a Comment