Re: [Rpcemu] Video performance

On 11 Apr 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
> In message <dad96b7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
> Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

[snip]

> > No Iyonix here, but some other results using FireBench v0.4:
> >
> > machine secs frames relative
> > /sec speed, %
> >
> > StrongARM RiscPC 75.61 211.61 100
> > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO4.39 39.19 408.26 193
> > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO5.19 28.39 563.57 266
> >
> > Win7 runs on a machine with a 1.60GHz core-duo processor.
>
> I have an Iyonix, and it performed as follows (approximately - I
> didn't take note of the decimal points). Also included, RPCEMu
> prformance here (PC has a 3.4GHz Core i7-2600 processor):
>
> machine secs frames relative
> speed, %
>
> Iyonix 36 444 210
> W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.9/4.02 17.57 911 430
> W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.8/5.17 14.3 1119 529
>
> For an explanation of the speed difference between RO 4.XX and 5.XX
> see this thread http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/10/topics/961

Interesting. For you, RPCEmu runs about twice as fast as for me, which
reflects the relative speeds of the Win7 processors.

Tony

_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu