Re: [Rpcemu] Video performance

On 12 Apr 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
> In message <f0d25a7f52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
> Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > In message <0326ac7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
> > > Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo..co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Interesting. For you, RPCEmu runs about twice as fast as for me,
> > > > which reflects the relative speeds of the Win7 processors.
> > >
> > > But we're both trumped by Chris Gransden's results for the BB-XM
> > > and Pandaboard ...:-)
> >
> > ... which have processor speeds of only 1.0GHz and 1.5GHz. I wonder
> > why RPCEmu should run so fast on slower hardware.
>
> If 'slower hardware' refers to the BB-XM and Pandaboard, perhaps it's
> because they are running RISC OS natively, and not under emulation.

So nothing to do with RPCEmu. Sorry, I misunderstood the table in Chris
Grandsden's post.

Tony

_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu