Rob Kendrick wrote on 25 Sep:
> Did you say "Netsurf 3.2" or "3.2" ?
The former. Is Mantis not robust enough to cope with both?
But upon doublechecking my iconbar, I find I'm wrong. I'm using "3.1
(Dev Cl #1718)" on this Iyonix. Must be one of my other machines
where I have 3.2 -- will check.
>> So I click "go back".
>> And there is a blank page expecting me to fill in ALL the info again.
>> Grrrrr.
> This is a problem with NetSurf, not the bug tracker. Modern browsers
> annotate history information with form data. We have a plan to do that
> too.
Glad to hear that.
This is first time I've used Mantis. Submitted occasional bug report
in the past on Sourceforge (which was not always straightforward,
using Netsurf; I think I recall that that's why you switched).
Info expected by Mantis in some fields was not obvious.
Is the best course then to leave such fields blank and just make sure
the freeform fields include all relevant info?
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
|| See you at the show? www.riscoslondonshow.co.uk Oct 25
No comments:
Post a Comment