In article <ac2ae8c553.Jo@hobbes.bass-software.com>,
John Tytgat <John.Tytgat@aaug.net> wrote:
> In message <DUB120-DS25CCE559AA95FFE130FA9F0B70@phx.gbl>
> "Alan Buckley" <alan_baa@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems there are a few potential problems so it may be
> > better to stick with GCC 4.1.2 after all.
> I disagree as...
> > Is there any compelling reason I should update to GCC 4.7?
> ...only by using the compiler on real code, we're able to find problems
> and fix them. We really can use that kind of testing now by other people
> and have problems reported. Otherwise the codebase risks to remain as is.
> But of course you have the choice to use whatever version you want.
> > If so, is there a way I can set the "-mno-unaligned-access" flag
> > in the autobuilder so I don't have to change every package?
> I would prefer to hear some details on this issue before resorting to
> workarounds. Chris ?
I'll try and find a simple program that exhibits the problem.
Chris.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
No comments:
Post a Comment