Re: [gccsdk] VFP revisited

In message <alpine.WNT.2.00.1503222007240.5032@Jeffrey-PC>
Jeffrey Lee <me@phlamethrower.co.uk> wrote:

> If you have any other comments/questions about the code then let me know.
> VFP/NEON support in GCC has now floated to near the top of my list of
> priorities, so until something knocks it off that spot I should be able to
> dedicate a fair amount of my time to making whatever changes are necessary to
> get things to a state where you're happy with them.

Thanks for the update on your earlier patch. For me it will take some time
to digest & review this all. Maybe another GCCSDK developer can help me
here.

One thing which is not clear to me : when using UnixLib as shared library,
do these combinations work:

- your program (or other shared libraries) built without use of VFP
+ UnixLib as shared library built with VFP support
- your program (or other shared libraries) built with use of VFP
+ UnixLib as shared library build without VFP support.

Or is this only supposed to be used for UnixLib as static library ?

John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home
John.Tytgat@aaug.net

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK