Re: #2654

Tony Moore, on 18 Mar, wrote:

> On 18 Mar 2015, David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> > Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Then this does sound like a bug or omission in HostFS, not NetSurf.
> >
> > It is not a NetSurf bug, it is just a helpful work around for foibles
> > elsewhere.
>
> [only just seen this thread] I was the OP of the feature request, and did
> explain the reasoning there.
>
> In RISC OS, if a directory is copied, its original datestamp is loat,
> however if a !Runimage is present then the application directory shows the
> datestamp of the !Runimage, thus preserving the datestamp of the original
> full-save.

Is this with VRPC?

--
David Pitt