Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic

On 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt <lists@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote:

> On 14 Jun, Michael Drake wrote in message
> <539C509C.8090109@netsurf-browser.org>:

>>
>>
>> On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>
>>>> We recently decided to make use of "!Cache" as we assumed it would be
>>>> suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
>>>> RISC OS at the moment, so we hadn't checked it actually worked.)
>>
>>> If you give some clues as to how to test it, some of us may be able to
>>> give feedback :-)
>>
>> Thanks, but I think it's already been tested enough to show it doesn't
>> work, as it stands. You should be able to put it in !Boot without it
>> throwing up errors or having other side-effects.
>>
>> Our options are to get Cache from http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/
>> fixed, and continue using it, or create our own simpler solution.
>>
>> Steve Fryatt: any thoughts on this?

> Well, I can't reproduce the problems that people are seeing. That's on
> RISC OS 5, with reasonably recent copies of !Boot, and !Cache placed in
> !Boot.Resources then left to be processed from there.

> I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence -- are all the people seeing
> issues doing that? What are people's Next slots configured to during the
> boot process?

I don't see any problems either, FWIW. Don't run NetSurf at Boot, and
Next at Boot is set at 1024K. ARMini, RISC OS 5.19 at the moment,
with !Cache in Resources. No idea of any of this is useful info.

[snip]

Best wishes,

Peter.

--
Peter Young (zfc W) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk