Daniel Silverstone, on 24 Jun, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:10:29 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
> > !Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the
> > improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is
> > written.
>
> You do realise that this is more work for the computer to do than simply
> increasing the maximum size of the RAM cache in the browser?
I had not got that far. The notion was just to highlight where the blockage
is.
In practice the two options perform similarly, as very briefly tested.
--
David Pitt
No comments:
Post a Comment