Re: Disc cache worth it?

Tony Moore, on 24 Jun, wrote:

> On 24 Jun 2014, David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > !Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the
> > improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is
> > written.
>
> NetSurf already has a Memory Cache. For the Disc Cache to serve any useful
> purpose, it needs to be written to a non-volatile medium.

Indeed. I do agree, I was just testing something.


--
David Pitt