On 02/02/2015 13:26, Theo Markettos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:29:24AM +0000, Duncan Moore wrote:
>> Yes, I think it is a bug. This page describes how to report bugs:
>> http://www.riscos.info/index.php/Bug_Reporting
> Reporting the bug doesn't always mean there is someone at the other end to
> fix it :(
I know - some bugs I've reported have been in the system for years. :(
But at least by reporting them, they won't get completely forgotten.
In this case though, we know where the bug is now. So I think we should
be able to fix it, and no longer need to report it.
> Duncan, would you be interested in porting your changes forward to the
> current Debian version of make (that's 4.0) and putting it in the
> autobuilder? That means it's easy to regenerate new versions. I think Make
> is one of those tools that inevitably is going to have more invasive changes
> than most ported software can get away with, so it's useful to have a
> closer watch on when it breaks.
>
That's not something that I want to get involved in myself. Sorry. But
if anybody else wants to do it, they are welcome to. The source
differences are in the zip file on my website (version 3.81). I also
have version 4.0, which I haven't released yet, but people are welcome
to that too.
Duncan
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
No comments:
Post a Comment