Re: [Rpcemu] RISC OS 5.17 benchmarked against 4.02

On 23 Oct 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> I recently ran Richard Spencer's benchmarking app romark 1.01 on both
> my RPCEmu installations (0.8.8

Any reason for not using 0.8.9?

> /5.17 and 0.8.9/4.02 respectively). Here
> are the results (0.8.8/5.17 first, % advantage of 0.8.8/5.17 last):

or 0.8.9/4.02 last?

[snip results, etc]

> ... I find the degree of difference generally, and in particular,
> HD/FS Read/Writes and Icon plotting, surprising.

Indeed.

Tony




_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu