Saturday, 30 June 2012

Re: JavaScript

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:16:58 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:

> the spidermonkey versions i have been targetting are the c API
> versions of the 1.8 series so are simply heavy rather than obease

Ah, obviously I downloaded the wrong one.

> most probably because the JSAPI native calling function spec changed
> in an incompatible way! can you tell me what JS_VERSION is on your
> version of the library? I might be able to come up with
> something...but currently I am a bit stumped how to alter the native
> calling convention at compile time without some hedious macro magic

#define JS_VERSION 150

See Ole's previous email and patches - which seem to work.

> So I guess that answers the question about which API major version to
> pick, I think 1.8 series is still the right target

Seems to be. I might have a go at a different version from the 1.8
line, see if I have more luck getting it to work.

Chris

No comments:

Post a Comment