Thursday, 14 June 2012

Re: [gccsdk] Nettle autobuilder patch

On 14/06/2012 20:55, John Tytgat wrote:
> In message <4FD9916F.2060307@archifishal.co.uk>
> Alex Macfarlane Smith <nospam@archifishal.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2012 13:43, Frank de Bruijn wrote:> In article
>> <SNT136-ds1987B1B004EB7E9CF73B01F0F70@phx.gbl>,
>> > Alan Buckley <alan_baa@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I notice it requires the SocketWatch module,
>> >
>> > You may want to look at http://www.aconet.org/tools/socketwatch.zip
>>
>> On 11/06/2012 13:21, Theo Markettos wrote:
>>> SocketWatch's source is in BASIC, so it probably won't autobuild. Is it OK
>>> to make 'binary-only' packages?
>>
>> I notice that Frank's version is in objasm format, so theoretically
>> could be committed into Nettle's CVS
>> (http://nettle.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nettle/SocketWatch/ ), and
>> then someone could write an autobuilder for that.
>>
>> Does that seem like a good plan to anyone? :)
>
> Sure :-)
>
> John.
>

Tis done -
http://nettle.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nettle/SocketWatch/Source/

I'm guessing it should be feasible for someone to modify the autobuilder
to build this with the makefile now anyway :)

Alex.


_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

No comments:

Post a Comment