Re: [gccsdk] VFP vs FPA in library builds

In article <0FCB5232-FB88-479B-B2F4-4F722A086C78@bigblue.net.au>,
Alan Williams <ajw@bigblue.net.au> wrote:
> Rhett,
> I have found my work on that and I would be very happy if it saves you some time.
> There is a file where I was keeping track of what I had done and what I wanted to get done.
> I just zipped up the whole dir and bunged it here:
> http://riscix.info/nettle12.tgz
> There is a conflict in that you can't us this and the default build interchangeable as mine extends the book marks file format to hold the key name and the original version doesn't like this. I think I only extended the English template file correctly. That is any other languages will have English names for the extra fields.
> I believe it was building and running on RISC OS 4.39 when I looked at it last about 2015, but I know it spat it when I tried it on a pi. Normally I just telnet a linux box and ssh from there so I just worked around the issue and never got back to it.

> I also did some other work to make it more putty/iTerm2 like in that selected text is put on the clip board and adjust I think pastes.

After building your version using the GCCSDK autobuilder logging in using a
key worked OK on a RPi 4.


_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK