Thanks for such a swift reply, Michael. Will digest and report back.
You said:
> The min-content value for width is just at editors draft stage.
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/
> So it's subject to change, and not standardized yet.
In the final para of my post, I didn't quote all the code I found in
that Stackoverflow suggestion about width:min-content (which was
dated 2015). The writer included interim lines addressed to specific
browsers while the aforementioned editors' deliberations continue. He
suggested:
figure {
width: -webkit-min-content;
width: -moz-min-content;
width: min-content;
}
That seems to mean Mozilla and Webkit. Is there perhaps an equivalent
for Netsurf?
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
|| See you at the show? www.riscos-swshow.co.uk Feb 24
No comments:
Post a Comment