On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:15:10PM +0100, Lee Noar wrote:
> John Ballance wrote:
> >p.s. I'm building quite a list of things where I have local patches to
> >the autobuilder scripts. Should theyy all come through you, or might it
> >be simpler if I put them in directly? (I guess I'm also asking whether
> >that could be arranged..)
>
> I think it's John Tytgat and Theo who have the power to give svn
> write access.
It's possible to allow write access, but it might be good if you posted
the patches here to begin with, just to make sure we're on the same page.
There are lots of moving parts to the autobuilder and (currently) we aren't
testing them all very regularly, so a little care is required in that
changing one thing to fix a problem here may cause issues for another
package over there. We can usually spot that by glancing over the code but
it might be something that might not be obvious if you aren't familiar with
some of the other packages.
As previously mentioned, just posting them to the list as attachments is
sufficient. If you want to get high tech (and don't mind dealing with
another version control system), git interfaces nicely with svn, handles
commits locally and will generate patch emails automatically.
Theo
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
No comments:
Post a Comment