Re: Possible integer overflow when calculating hysteresis in desktop/netsurf.c

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:03:43AM -0800, ori@eigenstate.org wrote:
> Quoth Thorsten Otto <admin@tho-otto.de>:
> > On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2021 19:09:35 CET Jonas wrote:
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I think that a compiler that defines size_t to be 32bit on a 64bit system is
> > broken ;)
>
> It's perfectly legal -- size_t is required to hold
> the maximum allowed object size. It's not required
> to be able to span the address space, or anything
> like that.

It's legal, but that doesn't have any relation to if it is sensible, or
if this is a bug.

Plan 9 is not sensible. And this is a bug in NetSurf.

B.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-dev mailing list -- netsurf-dev@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-dev-leave@netsurf-browser.org