Re: HTML's SUP

In article <5642c25e44chris@chris-johnson.org.uk>, cj
<chris@chris-johnson.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <A8BCDC15-DF7C-4389-AAA8-10595035D4CE@powys.org>, Tim
> Powys-Lybbe <tim@powys.org> wrote:
> > Hi,

> > I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in
> > Netsurf 3.3, so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in that, finally I
> > read the advice and got last night's 4088 build and it still didn't,
> > so I wonder if this is something that I have not read about. Is
> > <SUP> not a recognised modern feature?

> I have a feeling that SUP (and SUB) have never been implemented. I had
> a lot of trouble when making chemistry related web pages years ago.

I find that both <sup> and a defined CSS class ("super") both render
superscripts correctly in 3.7 #4085.

www.timil.com/temp/superscript.htm

--

Tim Hill

timil.com : tjrh.eu : butterwick.eu : blue-bike.uk : youngtheatre.co.uk