Friday, 17 May 2013

Re: Testing required: visited link performance

In article <534d692c69tlsa@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> In article <534d633ccbtim@timil.com>,
> Tim Hill <tim@timil.com> wrote:

> > Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
> > Build #1177: 13.0s
> > Build #1178: 13.7s
> > Build #1179: 22.6s

> > Site: http://slashdot.org/
> > Build #1177: 8.5s
> > Build #1178: 8.4s
> > Build #1179: 25.0s

> The #1179 results are odd. Was that with JavaScript on, or with the
> computer busy doing something else?

On.

On the one hand I didn't think anything else was going at the time but on
the other I can't repeat those times. Now 10s and 13.2s. Timings are
representative of several attempts in all cases.

No comments:

Post a Comment