On 5 Dec 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
[snip]
> However, this does not explain how I am able to make 1824 x 1026 x 16M
> run on RPCEmu089/5.17 and not on 089/4.02 using the same MDF - I'm
> still mystified.
Agreed. If my arithmetic is correct, that resolution, and colour depth,
requires a VRAM of 7.14MB, so it _should_ fit into the 8MB emulated VRAM
available on both 5.17 and 4.02. I can't suggest why it doesn't.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
No comments:
Post a Comment