In article <839aaaa2-cf8e-cd31-40c8-db9a654ca13e@sky.com>,
Lee Noar <leenoar@sky.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/18 11:05, Ron wrote:
> > Compared to an earlier version of the create-gcckit script, the current
> > version is missing the line ~64
> > GCCSDK_UNPACKED=$GCCSDK_RELEASE_AREA/full
> > The build I did resembles the related script lines not working.
> > and I am rebuilding ro-native with it back in, (as I write this)
> >
> > It appears the changes to the create-gccsdk script were done a long time
> > ago, It is also that long since I have built ro-native .
> GCCSDK_UNPACKED is defined at around line 307. The references in lines
> above this are within functions which are only called after the
> definition. At a glance, it looks correct. What problem are you seeing?
> Lee.
My fault, it was because I thought the create-gccsdk would get called by
make ro-native.
Everything is fine now that I've run create-gccsdk as the last step in the
process.
I didn't get a zipped package and I dont have NFS, but found Sparkfs tar
converts all the filetypes from a tar cf archive.
I see I could leave the .la files in from the create-gcc script.
I'm looking at porting libtool, and noticed there is an option for using
dlopen , dlopen with help, or without dlopen.
Any suggestions on a suitable approach, or should they all work?
The other thing would be if SharedLibs$Path is builtin to unixlib, or
do I get it from the environment manually?
It looks like I'd have to monitor LD_LIBRARY_PATH in case that alternative
was used. Perhaps libtool only needs to work on a local build directory,
and the installation could be a separate manual step?
Thanks, and sorry about the false report.
Ronald May
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Friday, 6 April 2018
Re: [gccsdk] gccsdk gcc4 fails to build
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:18:55PM +0100, John Ballance wrote:
> FWIW it has just failed here.. building in jenkins on ubuntu 17.10 new
> install
>
> tail of log is
>
> autoreconf: running: automake --no-force
> Unescaped left brace in regex is illegal here in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/\${ <-- HERE ([^ \t=:+{}]+)}/ at /home/jb/jenkins_gccsdk/gcc4/builddir/installed-buildtools-for-gcc/bin/automake line 4113.
> autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 255
> Makefile:545: recipe for target 'src-gcc-copied' failed
> make[1]: *** [src-gcc-copied] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jb/jenkins_gccsdk/gcc4'
> Makefile:255: recipe for target 'getenv' failed
> make: *** [getenv] Error 2
>
> Does this help?
That seems to be a different problem. What version(s) of
automake/autoconf/aclocal do you have installed?
Forgot to ask: Michael, what OS/distro are you building GCCSDK with?
For reference, I think ci.riscos.info is currently building with Ubuntu
14.04.
Theo
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
> FWIW it has just failed here.. building in jenkins on ubuntu 17.10 new
> install
>
> tail of log is
>
> autoreconf: running: automake --no-force
> Unescaped left brace in regex is illegal here in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/\${ <-- HERE ([^ \t=:+{}]+)}/ at /home/jb/jenkins_gccsdk/gcc4/builddir/installed-buildtools-for-gcc/bin/automake line 4113.
> autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 255
> Makefile:545: recipe for target 'src-gcc-copied' failed
> make[1]: *** [src-gcc-copied] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jb/jenkins_gccsdk/gcc4'
> Makefile:255: recipe for target 'getenv' failed
> make: *** [getenv] Error 2
>
> Does this help?
That seems to be a different problem. What version(s) of
automake/autoconf/aclocal do you have installed?
Forgot to ask: Michael, what OS/distro are you building GCCSDK with?
For reference, I think ci.riscos.info is currently building with Ubuntu
14.04.
Theo
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [gccsdk] gccsdk gcc4 fails to build
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:35:28PM +0200, Michael Grunditz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to port UAE (uae4arm or amiberry) to riscos.. As they are SDL
> based I thought it might be a good idea to use gccsdk.
> But , gcc fails to build.
Can you put the full log somewhere?
(pastebin or equivalent will do)
Jenkins did recently successfully build GCCSDK:
http://ci.riscos.info/job/gcc-4.7-cross/213/console
so I suspect it's something in your setup.
Theo
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
> Hi
>
> I want to port UAE (uae4arm or amiberry) to riscos.. As they are SDL
> based I thought it might be a good idea to use gccsdk.
> But , gcc fails to build.
Can you put the full log somewhere?
(pastebin or equivalent will do)
Jenkins did recently successfully build GCCSDK:
http://ci.riscos.info/job/gcc-4.7-cross/213/console
so I suspect it's something in your setup.
Theo
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
[gccsdk] gccsdk gcc4 fails to build
Hi
I want to port UAE (uae4arm or amiberry) to riscos.. As they are SDL
based I thought it might be a good idea to use gccsdk.
But , gcc fails to build.
-c /home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.c -o toplev.o
/home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:524:1: error:
redefinition of 'floor_log2'
floor_log2 (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT x)
^
In file included from /home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:59:0:
/home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.h:175:1: note: previous
definition of 'floor_log2' was here
floor_log2 (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT x)
^
/home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:559:1: error:
redefinition of 'exact_log2'
exact_log2 (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT x)
^
In file included from /home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:59:0:
/home/micken/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/gcc/gcc/toplev.h:181:1: note: previous
definition of 'exact_log2' was here
exact_log2 (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT x)
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [gccsdk] create-gcckit missing GCCSDK_UNPACKED def
On 06/04/18 11:05, Ron wrote:
> Compared to an earlier version of the create-gcckit script, the current
> version is missing the line ~64
> GCCSDK_UNPACKED=$GCCSDK_RELEASE_AREA/full
> The build I did resembles the related script lines not working.
> and I am rebuilding ro-native with it back in, (as I write this)
>
> It appears the changes to the create-gccsdk script were done a long time
> ago, It is also that long since I have built ro-native .
GCCSDK_UNPACKED is defined at around line 307. The references in lines
above this are within functions which are only called after the
definition. At a glance, it looks correct. What problem are you seeing?
Lee.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
> Compared to an earlier version of the create-gcckit script, the current
> version is missing the line ~64
> GCCSDK_UNPACKED=$GCCSDK_RELEASE_AREA/full
> The build I did resembles the related script lines not working.
> and I am rebuilding ro-native with it back in, (as I write this)
>
> It appears the changes to the create-gccsdk script were done a long time
> ago, It is also that long since I have built ro-native .
GCCSDK_UNPACKED is defined at around line 307. The references in lines
above this are within functions which are only called after the
definition. At a glance, it looks correct. What problem are you seeing?
Lee.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
[gccsdk] create-gcckit missing GCCSDK_UNPACKED def
Compared to an earlier version of the create-gcckit script, the current
version is missing the line ~64
GCCSDK_UNPACKED=$GCCSDK_RELEASE_AREA/full
The build I did resembles the related script lines not working.
and I am rebuilding ro-native with it back in, (as I write this)
It appears the changes to the create-gccsdk script were done a long time
ago, It is also that long since I have built ro-native .
Ron M.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
version is missing the line ~64
GCCSDK_UNPACKED=$GCCSDK_RELEASE_AREA/full
The build I did resembles the related script lines not working.
and I am rebuilding ro-native with it back in, (as I write this)
It appears the changes to the create-gccsdk script were done a long time
ago, It is also that long since I have built ro-native .
Ron M.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Saturday, 31 March 2018
Re: date in search results
On 31 Mar, tim@timil.com wrote:
> In article <8b087de156.John@rickman.argonet..co.uk>, John Rickman
> <rickman@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
> > In message <56cb6af6b5tim@timil.com> Tim Hill <tim@timil.com> wrote:
> [Snip]
> > The option which allowed you to specify a date range has been removed.
> They've removed it from there now too?
> Isn't that typical?. You have to perform a search and then modify it,
> at least, in other browsers:
> 1. make a google search.
> 2. on the results page look for "Tools"
> 3. now select 'Any time' -> Custom range, pick your dates.
> So much for 'advanced' search! Easier to make a simple one and change
> it.
> But that doesn't help NetSurf users, unfortunately.
P.S. Being curious, I have just been reading about the search parameter
'daterange' and the example given by Google is if you want to examine
documents with a modification date in a range you would search for
parrot daterange:2008-08-01..2008-12-24
ie.
http://google.com/search?q=parrot+daterange:2008-08-01..2008-12-24
But it doesn't seem to work. It's just gets your RISC OS box blocked from
making Google searches and you can't click on the message response
proving you're a human. Using their own example. Duh.
--
Tim Hill
timil.com : tjrh.eu : butterwick.eu : blue-bike.uk : youngtheatre.co.uk
> In article <8b087de156.John@rickman.argonet..co.uk>, John Rickman
> <rickman@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
> > In message <56cb6af6b5tim@timil.com> Tim Hill <tim@timil.com> wrote:
> [Snip]
> > The option which allowed you to specify a date range has been removed.
> They've removed it from there now too?
> Isn't that typical?. You have to perform a search and then modify it,
> at least, in other browsers:
> 1. make a google search.
> 2. on the results page look for "Tools"
> 3. now select 'Any time' -> Custom range, pick your dates.
> So much for 'advanced' search! Easier to make a simple one and change
> it.
> But that doesn't help NetSurf users, unfortunately.
P.S. Being curious, I have just been reading about the search parameter
'daterange' and the example given by Google is if you want to examine
documents with a modification date in a range you would search for
parrot daterange:2008-08-01..2008-12-24
ie.
http://google.com/search?q=parrot+daterange:2008-08-01..2008-12-24
But it doesn't seem to work. It's just gets your RISC OS box blocked from
making Google searches and you can't click on the message response
proving you're a human. Using their own example. Duh.
--
Tim Hill
timil.com : tjrh.eu : butterwick.eu : blue-bike.uk : youngtheatre.co.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)