On 15 May 2013, Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
[snip]
> #1172 loads in 16 secs, and quits in 26 secs. The closing log is here
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/77062274/Log_1172
Another problem with #1172 (and #1125): #417 takes 6 secs to full-save
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page , whereas #1172 takes 33 secs.
Could this be related to the delayed quit?
Tony
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
[Rpcemu] Trying to transfer stuff off an IOMega Zip drive
Hi,
I'm trying to transfer some ADFS data off a Zip drive, and I've compiled the 0.8.10 source. (I turned off JIT, because it just gave me a blue screen.)
I used dd to copy the disk written on my A3000's SCSI Zip, using a USB Zip on my Linux box, but I read in the docs that its geometry isn't supported: fdisk said it has this:
Disk /dev/sdb: 100 MB, 100663296 bytes
4 heads, 48 sectors/track, 1024 cylinders, total 196608 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Even assuming I find where in the source it's hard wired to 63 sectors and 16 heads, is it likely to be able to read the data, or isn't it that simple? I tried arcem (with suitable configuration) and it claimed the image wasn't an ADFS disk.
Thanks,
Tim
I'm trying to transfer some ADFS data off a Zip drive, and I've compiled the 0.8.10 source. (I turned off JIT, because it just gave me a blue screen.)
I used dd to copy the disk written on my A3000's SCSI Zip, using a USB Zip on my Linux box, but I read in the docs that its geometry isn't supported: fdisk said it has this:
Disk /dev/sdb: 100 MB, 100663296 bytes
4 heads, 48 sectors/track, 1024 cylinders, total 196608 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Even assuming I find where in the source it's hard wired to 63 sectors and 16 heads, is it likely to be able to read the data, or isn't it that simple? I tried arcem (with suitable configuration) and it claimed the image wasn't an ADFS disk.
Thanks,
Tim
Re: [Rpcemu] Upgrading from 0.8.9 to 0.8.10
On 15 May 2013, george greenfield <george.greenfield@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> I've downloaded the 0.8.10 zip file and was wondering, is it feasible
> simply to copy across the new RPCEmu-Interpreter and RPCEmu-Recompiler
> into my existing 0.8.9 RPCEmu folder (which contains an 1GB HD4 drive
> as well as Hostfs, 4.02 Roms and all the usual files), or is it
> necessary (or desirable) to create a brand-new 0.8.10 folder?
I created two folders, v089 and v0810, in Program Files\RPCEmu, then
moved the 089 RPCEmu-Interpreter and RPCEmu-Recompiler files into the
v089 folder, before copying the 0810 files into Program Files\RPCEmu.
If you need to revert to 089, the 0810 files can be moved into the v0810
folder, and then the 089 files retrieved from the v089 folder.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
> I've downloaded the 0.8.10 zip file and was wondering, is it feasible
> simply to copy across the new RPCEmu-Interpreter and RPCEmu-Recompiler
> into my existing 0.8.9 RPCEmu folder (which contains an 1GB HD4 drive
> as well as Hostfs, 4.02 Roms and all the usual files), or is it
> necessary (or desirable) to create a brand-new 0.8.10 folder?
I created two folders, v089 and v0810, in Program Files\RPCEmu, then
moved the 089 RPCEmu-Interpreter and RPCEmu-Recompiler files into the
v089 folder, before copying the 0810 files into Program Files\RPCEmu.
If you need to revert to 089, the 0810 files can be moved into the v0810
folder, and then the 089 files retrieved from the v089 folder.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: quitting netsurf
On 15 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:09:47PM +0000, Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > > Probably not. Is your hotlist in the least bit private? If it
> > > does not contain private URLs, having a copy (sent directly to me
> > > or another developer rather than in the open) would be very useful
> > > for diagnosing what it causing the slowness.
>
> > No problem. I've sent you a copy, off-list.
>
> Irritatingly this hotlist takes 4ms to save on my laptop (I don't have
> a RISC OS box) and I can't spot anything obvious in the hotlist save
> path. I've annotated the hotlist save path with some logging and
> would appreciate it if you would do the trivial test of loading NS and
> quitting it, and then emailing me the log file. Obviously you should
> use the latest CI build of NetSurf (#1172 or later).
#1172 loads in 16 secs, and quits in 26 secs. The closing log is here
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/77062274/Log_1172
Tony
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:09:47PM +0000, Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > > Probably not. Is your hotlist in the least bit private? If it
> > > does not contain private URLs, having a copy (sent directly to me
> > > or another developer rather than in the open) would be very useful
> > > for diagnosing what it causing the slowness.
>
> > No problem. I've sent you a copy, off-list.
>
> Irritatingly this hotlist takes 4ms to save on my laptop (I don't have
> a RISC OS box) and I can't spot anything obvious in the hotlist save
> path. I've annotated the hotlist save path with some logging and
> would appreciate it if you would do the trivial test of loading NS and
> quitting it, and then emailing me the log file. Obviously you should
> use the latest CI build of NetSurf (#1172 or later).
#1172 loads in 16 secs, and quits in 26 secs. The closing log is here
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/77062274/Log_1172
Tony
Re: NS 3.1 json Dev C1#1171 - 2 problems
Roger Darlington wrote
> I can check checkboxes written in java, but nothing happens if I click
> on the 'Search Using Checkboxes' icon (nor on the [RESET] icon.
Support for mouse events eg mouseover, on select etc are not
implemented yet.
Your page uses the jquery library. This, along with some other popular
js libraries, is not yet supported.
I discussed both these features with the NS team at Wakefield. They
said they were working on it but it was a huge amount of work with a
lot of dependencies
John
--
John Rickman - http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/lynx
> I can check checkboxes written in java, but nothing happens if I click
> on the 'Search Using Checkboxes' icon (nor on the [RESET] icon.
Support for mouse events eg mouseover, on select etc are not
implemented yet.
Your page uses the jquery library. This, along with some other popular
js libraries, is not yet supported.
I discussed both these features with the NS team at Wakefield. They
said they were working on it but it was a huge amount of work with a
lot of dependencies
John
--
John Rickman - http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/lynx
Re: NS 3.1 json Dev C1#1171 - 2 problems
On 15 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:55:48PM +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
>> This works properly in NS dev vers r12638 (and many others of this
>> period)
> This is from before a huge rework of frames, so your first problem is a real
> bug, please file it in the bug tracker.
Thanks.
That bit Bug Trackered.
>> Of course, there may well be some writing somewhere that says Netsurf
>> 3.1 doesn't yet do these things, and that the team are working on it ?
> In brief -- if it's JavaScript based, it doesn't work in NetSurf yet.
> Our JS support is *very* rudimentary as yet -- we have a long long way to go.
> If it works, then bonus for you. If it doesn't, that's expected at
> this point
> and you're unlikely to gain friends by reporting bugs about it just yet :-)
Ah, right, OK.
> D.
--
Cheers
Roger
If I knew where I was I wouldn't be here
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:55:48PM +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
>> This works properly in NS dev vers r12638 (and many others of this
>> period)
> This is from before a huge rework of frames, so your first problem is a real
> bug, please file it in the bug tracker.
Thanks.
That bit Bug Trackered.
>> Of course, there may well be some writing somewhere that says Netsurf
>> 3.1 doesn't yet do these things, and that the team are working on it ?
> In brief -- if it's JavaScript based, it doesn't work in NetSurf yet.
> Our JS support is *very* rudimentary as yet -- we have a long long way to go.
> If it works, then bonus for you. If it doesn't, that's expected at
> this point
> and you're unlikely to gain friends by reporting bugs about it just yet :-)
Ah, right, OK.
> D.
--
Cheers
Roger
If I knew where I was I wouldn't be here
Re: NS 3.1 json Dev C1#1171 - 2 problems
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:55:48PM +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
> This works properly in NS dev vers r12638 (and many others of this
> period)
This is from before a huge rework of frames, so your first problem is a real
bug, please file it in the bug tracker.
> Of course, there may well be some writing somewhere that says Netsurf
> 3.1 doesn't yet do these things, and that the team are working on it ?
In brief -- if it's JavaScript based, it doesn't work in NetSurf yet.
Our JS support is *very* rudimentary as yet -- we have a long long way to go.
If it works, then bonus for you. If it doesn't, that's expected at this point
and you're unlikely to gain friends by reporting bugs about it just yet :-)
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69
> This works properly in NS dev vers r12638 (and many others of this
> period)
This is from before a huge rework of frames, so your first problem is a real
bug, please file it in the bug tracker.
> Of course, there may well be some writing somewhere that says Netsurf
> 3.1 doesn't yet do these things, and that the team are working on it ?
In brief -- if it's JavaScript based, it doesn't work in NetSurf yet.
Our JS support is *very* rudimentary as yet -- we have a long long way to go.
If it works, then bonus for you. If it doesn't, that's expected at this point
and you're unlikely to gain friends by reporting bugs about it just yet :-)
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)