Re: scrolling jerky

In article <be1b188652.rogerarm@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm@freeuk.com> wrote:

> Scrolling very jerky on the vertical slider

Please see my response to your previous scrolling thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org/msg03976.html

Your google URL is the scrolling frames issue.

--

Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/

scrolling jerky

Scrolling very jerky on the vertical slider here:
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Ferns.jpg&imgrefurl=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ferns.jpg&usg=__rbgkyfcIqj_kb2rmiAQqpGz-ep4=&h=1067&w=1600&sz=847&hl=en&start=12&zoom=1&tbnid=2wjruNPJi1NpKM:&tbnh=100&tbnw=150&ei=rE2YT6fNGI6f8gOY0Jz_BQ&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dferns%2Bimages%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26gbv%3D1%26ie%3DUTF-8%26tbm%3Disch&itbs=1


But much smoother here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ferns.jpg

Notice that other than the vertical scroll-bar, the two pages are
identical, which makes comparison of scrolling speed easy, and the
difference between tham is easily discernible.

Netsurf r13571

--

Cheers
Roger
Lonely pen tops. Where are their pen pals?

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 Native Compilation Segmentation Fault

On 25/04/12 17:17, pdmiller@pdmiller1.plus.com wrote:
> I've just installed GCC 4.1.2 release 1 onto my VRPC AdjustSA RO 6.20
> system, including SharedUnixlib 1.12, and the latest !SharedLibs. I get a
> segmentation fault when compiling certain c files. It looks like they are
> greater than a certain size in some way. They compile ok with the previous
> GCC release. I don't remember getting this error with the previous
> release,
> or having to do anything to increase a slot size, etc. My next slot is set
> to 10240k. Have I missed or forgotten to do something, or is it a real
> bug.

Could you please post one of the offending files that will demonstrate
the problem.

Thanks,
Lee.

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

[gccsdk] [Bug 227] New: GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 getcwd problem

http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=227

Summary: GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 getcwd problem
Product: GCC/GCCSDK
Version: other
Platform: Other
OS/Version: RISC OS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: C compiler
AssignedTo: John.Tytgat@aaug.net
ReportedBy: duncan_moore@ntlworld.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0


VRPC RISC OS 4.39

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main() {
printf("%i\n",strlen(getcwd(NULL,0)));
return 0;
}

With GCC 4.1.2 Release 1:

*gcc -o test getcwd.c
*test
0

Earlier versions give correct output like:

43

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

[gccsdk] [Bug 226] New: GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 strftime problem

http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=226

Summary: GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 strftime problem
Product: GCC/GCCSDK
Version: other
Platform: Other
OS/Version: RISC OS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: C compiler
AssignedTo: John.Tytgat@aaug.net
ReportedBy: duncan_moore@ntlworld.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0


#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
int main() {
time_t t=time(0);
struct tm *now=localtime(&t);
char ubuf[1024];
size_t len=strftime(ubuf,sizeof ubuf,"%a %b %e %H:%M:%S %Z %Y",now);
printf("length = %lu\n",len);
if (len) printf("string = %s\n",ubuf);
return 0;
}

With GCC 4.1.2 Release 1:

*gcc -o test time.c
*test
length = 0

Earlier versions give correct output like:

length = 28
string = Wed Apr 25 16:50:46 BST 2012

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

[gccsdk] GCC 4.1.2 Release 1 Native Compilation Segmentation Fault

I've just installed GCC 4.1.2 release 1 onto my VRPC AdjustSA RO 6.20
system, including SharedUnixlib 1.12, and the latest !SharedLibs. I get a
segmentation fault when compiling certain c files. It looks like they are
greater than a certain size in some way. They compile ok with the previous
GCC release. I don't remember getting this error with the previous
release,
or having to do anything to increase a slot size, etc. My next slot is set
to 10240k. Have I missed or forgotten to do something, or is it a real
bug.


Regards,

Pete Miller.
pdmiller@pdmiller1.plus.com




_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

[gccsdk] GCC 4.1.2 release 1 package won't upgrade from the previous version

When using RiscPkg or PackMan to update the GCC4 it fails

with a dialogue "files that conflict" with the file:

 

Selecting-the-Target-System/html

 

I've tracked this down to a change in the case of this

file between the two releases.

 

The old version was:

 

Selecting-The-Target-System/html

 

Note the capital 'T' in 'the'.

 

Would it be possible to restore the old case in the

packages and upload a new version?

 

Regards,

Alan