[netsurf-dev] Re: Pull request: CSS support for libsvgtiny

On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 12:27 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> As promised, and only a month late. My branch is available at,
>
> https://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/libsvgtiny.git libcss
>
> For best results, you should also apply the libcss patch I recently
> posted that makes fill- and stroke-opacity inherited properties.
>
> No major issues remain. There's a test suite in test/css consisting
> of a bunch of SVG files that you can open side-by-side in the
> libsvgtiny example program and your favorite image viewer. With the
> libcss patch, they all pass (compared to firefox). Without it, two
> fail.
>
> If you recall, there was some concern about the licensing of the
> select handlers. I think I spent enough time learning and rewriting
> the handlers to alleviate those concerns; I ultimately did not copy
> anything from NetSurf, although naturally many of the handlers look
> similar (and of course I reimplemented them *after* looking at the
> NetSurf handlers, so you be the judge).

Any chance I can rekindle the interest in this? I'm still around to
support the patchset and there are no known bugs.

Long term, I think using libcss is a better approach for parsing all of
the CSS properties that now live inside the SVG spec. Short term, it
would be great for me if I could use libsvgtiny as a librsvg
replacement inside of GTK where the "symbolic icons" use <style> tags
to override some colors.

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

On 13 Oct, Richard Torrens (lists) <Lists@Torrens.org> wrote:

> I can't see how to report this via the system using Risc OS...

> http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11h/
> photos 7697.jpg and 7689.jpg display.
> photos 7699.jpg and 7700.jpg do not.

> other pages, e.g.
> http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11f
> display all photos as they should.

> Other browsers display as they should.

> This happens on Titanium (5.30) and on Pinebook (5.29) - so I can't see
> that it is anything to do with the OS. The html on the 'faulty' page is
> fine.

> It's a very puzzling problem. Not important to me as the page works properly
> (it's a Perl program) but the developers might like to investigate.

Works OK here. Titanium 5.30; Netsurf 3.12 (Dev CI#6756).

--
Rod Grover
groverr@orpheusmail.co.uk

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

In article <762d6eaf5b.harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk>,
Harriet Bazley <lists@bazleyfamily.co.uk> wrote:
> On 13 Oct 2024 as I do recall,
> John Rickman wrote:

> > In message <5baf1e2300Lists@Torrens.org>
> > "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11h/
> > > photos 7697.jpg and 7689.jpg display.
> > > photos 7699.jpg and 7700.jpg do not.
> >
> > Works ok on ARMX6 with Netsurf 3.11
> > (if 7689 is a typo for 7698)
> >
> Not for me it doesn't...

RISC OS 6.20 Netsurf 3.12

All work for me...

Dave

--

Dave Triffid

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

On 13 Oct 2024 as I do recall,
John Rickman wrote:

> In message <5baf1e2300Lists@Torrens.org>
> "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org> wrote:
>
>
> > http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11h/
> > photos 7697.jpg and 7689.jpg display.
> > photos 7699.jpg and 7700.jpg do not.
>
> Works ok on ARMX6 with Netsurf 3.11
> (if 7689 is a typo for 7698)
>
Not for me it doesn't...


--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==

Today is the last day of your life so far.

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

On 13 Oct 2024 as I do recall,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:

> I can't see how to report this via the system using Risc OS...

The 'system' is https://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/mantis/view_all_bug_page.php
which should work under Netsurf.


>
> http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11h/
> photos 7697.jpg and 7689.jpg display.
> photos 7699.jpg and 7700.jpg do not.
>
>

I see the same on ARMX6 with Netsurf reporting version 3.11 (did I
download a new 'stable' release without noticing?)


--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==

An atheist is a man with no invisible means of support.

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

In article <45803baf5b.phorefaux@a9home.lan>,
Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> wrote:
> In message <5baf1e2300Lists@Torrens.org>
> "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org> wrote:

> > I can't see how to report this via the system using Risc OS...

> > http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11h/
> > photos 7697.jpg and 7689.jpg display.
> > photos 7699.jpg and 7700.jpg do not.

> > other pages, e.g.
> > http://cards.westdorset.org/types/img/D-11f
> > display all photos as they should.

> > Other browsers display as they should.

> > This happens on Titanium (5.30) and on Pinebook (5.29) - so I can't see
> > that it is anything to do with the OS. The html on the 'faulty' page is
> > fine.

> > It's a very puzzling problem. Not important to me as the page works
> > properly (it's a Perl program) but the developers might like to
> > investigate.

> All images display fine here
> RISC OS 4.42
> NetSurf 3.12 (#6762)

Ditto
NetSurf 3.12 (#6762)
FAST Pi Compute Module 4 RISC OS 5.29

--
Chris Newman

[netsurf-users] Re: Weird bug

In message <bcfb43af5b.John@rickman.argonet.co.uk>
John Rickman <rickman@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

>> But it doesn't work on 4te2 with NetSurf 3.11, or with the latest 3.12
>> (Dev 67640.


It works on my 4te2 NetSurf 3.10
John

--
John Rickman