In message <5abaa82a53mec@npost.uk>
Chris Newman <mec@npost.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
> If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I get
> version Dev C1# 5415.
> Would someone kindly explain?
Perhaps the announcement by Michael Drake about a new toolchain
(https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/17766) is the
explanation.
Using Frank de Bruijn's latest version of Fetch_NS (2.50 17-03-2023)
allows the user to select those versions built with the new toolchain by
setting "Set Fetch_NS$NewToolchain 1" (without the quotes) in the settings
file.
Dave
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Tuesday, 27 June 2023
Re: Netsurf versions
On 27 Jun 2023 Dave wrote:
> In article <adebbbba5a.ricp@user.minijem.plus.com>,
> Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Jun 2023 Chris Newman wrote:
>>> If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
>>> If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I
>>> get version Dev C1# 5415.
>>> Would someone kindly explain?
>> I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
>> as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
>> sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
>> Richard
> Interesting...
> On the list as displayed here by Netsurf, from the above noted URL, 5433
> is 30 items down the list, not at the top.
Yes but 5415 to 5433 are, as a block, at the top. That leaves 5433 in the
middle of the whole list.
--
Richard Porter
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
> In article <adebbbba5a.ricp@user.minijem.plus.com>,
> Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Jun 2023 Chris Newman wrote:
>>> If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
>>> If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I
>>> get version Dev C1# 5415.
>>> Would someone kindly explain?
>> I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
>> as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
>> sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
>> Richard
> Interesting...
> On the list as displayed here by Netsurf, from the above noted URL, 5433
> is 30 items down the list, not at the top.
Yes but 5415 to 5433 are, as a block, at the top. That leaves 5433 in the
middle of the whole list.
--
Richard Porter
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Monday, 26 June 2023
Re: Netsurf versions
In article <adebbbba5a.ricp@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2023 Chris Newman wrote:
> > If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
> > If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I
> > get version Dev C1# 5415.
> > Would someone kindly explain?
> I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
> as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
> sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
> Richard
Interesting...
On the list as displayed here by Netsurf, from the above noted URL, 5433
is 30 items down the list, not at the top.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2023 Chris Newman wrote:
> > If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
> > If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I
> > get version Dev C1# 5415.
> > Would someone kindly explain?
> I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
> as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
> sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
> Richard
Interesting...
On the list as displayed here by Netsurf, from the above noted URL, 5433
is 30 items down the list, not at the top.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Re: Netsurf versions
On 26 Jun 2023 Chris Newman wrote:
> If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
> If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I get
> version Dev C1# 5415.
> Would someone kindly explain?
I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
Richard
--
Richard Porter https://www.minijem.plus.com
t: @westernexplorer mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
Sent from my ... if you really want to know look at the headers.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
> If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
> If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I get
> version Dev C1# 5415.
> Would someone kindly explain?
I use https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ and that goes as far
as 5414. I've just noticed that 5415 to 5433 are hidden away in clear
sight at the top of the list. I'd never thought of looking there.
Richard
--
Richard Porter https://www.minijem.plus.com
t: @westernexplorer mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
Sent from my ... if you really want to know look at the headers.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Netsurf versions
Hi,
If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I get
version Dev C1# 5415.
Would someone kindly explain?
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
If I use !Fetch_NS I get version Dev C1# 5433.
If I go through the Download latest NetSurf fro th browser itself I get
version Dev C1# 5415.
Would someone kindly explain?
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Saturday, 24 June 2023
[gccsdk] Hatari (vfp) 2.3.1-1 on riscos.info audio thread fails to initialise
To whom it may concern,
Theo Markettos suggested I post a bug report here with regard to the
hatari (vfp) 2.3.1-1 package on riscos.info.
It started with The Bard's Tale (TBT). That game consumed an Atari ST and
months of my life many decades ago. So when I discovered the build of
Hatari (vfp) 2.3.1-1 available on riscos.info, in a fit of nostalgia I
attempted to play TBT with it. However, it does not play audio. Music (of
sorts) is an integral part of TBT gameplay. The fault appears to lie
within the linked-in (customised?) build of the SDL library. Hatari's
audio thread failed to initialise. I didn't dig deeper into the binary to
try to figure out why. I was able to rebuild Hatari 2.3.1 from source
without too much trouble. I then found that audio worked as expected. So
if a customised version of SDL was indeed used, I suggest that the hatari
package on riscos.info be rebuilt and tested using the default GCCSDK
packages. I have no idea whose very-low-priority job that would be. It is
likely I'm the only person who cared, and I don't any more because my own
build works well enough. If it is nobody's job, then I'd consider making
it my job if someone could outline how I'd make it my job... if someone
cares.
--
Regards,
Christopher Martin
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Theo Markettos suggested I post a bug report here with regard to the
hatari (vfp) 2.3.1-1 package on riscos.info.
It started with The Bard's Tale (TBT). That game consumed an Atari ST and
months of my life many decades ago. So when I discovered the build of
Hatari (vfp) 2.3.1-1 available on riscos.info, in a fit of nostalgia I
attempted to play TBT with it. However, it does not play audio. Music (of
sorts) is an integral part of TBT gameplay. The fault appears to lie
within the linked-in (customised?) build of the SDL library. Hatari's
audio thread failed to initialise. I didn't dig deeper into the binary to
try to figure out why. I was able to rebuild Hatari 2.3.1 from source
without too much trouble. I then found that audio worked as expected. So
if a customised version of SDL was indeed used, I suggest that the hatari
package on riscos.info be rebuilt and tested using the default GCCSDK
packages. I have no idea whose very-low-priority job that would be. It is
likely I'm the only person who cared, and I don't any more because my own
build works well enough. If it is nobody's job, then I'd consider making
it my job if someone could outline how I'd make it my job... if someone
cares.
--
Regards,
Christopher Martin
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Monday, 19 June 2023
Re: User Agent
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:55:35AM +0300, jtzz11@post.com wrote:
> What does "--url_file" do? will NS load all urls listed there?
It controls where the URL database is stored, ie history etc. It does
not do what you want.
We should probably provide a way to define more than one home page in
preferences to open multiple windows/tabs, but this may end up being
front-end specific rather than in the core.
B.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
> What does "--url_file" do? will NS load all urls listed there?
It controls where the URL database is stored, ie history etc. It does
not do what you want.
We should probably provide a way to define more than one home page in
preferences to open multiple windows/tabs, but this may end up being
front-end specific rather than in the core.
B.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-leave@netsurf-browser.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)