Re: KYP West

In article <562119693cbbailey@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <e7f2052156.ricp@user.minijem.plus.com>,
> Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
> > On 22 Mar 2017 Tony Moore wrote:

> > > On 22 Mar 2017, Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> > >> This looks to a really interesting site

> > > URL?

> > > Tony

> > I would hazard a guess that it might be http://www.kypwest.org.uk/

> That's correct. Sorry, I fired the email off before I remembered that I
> had forgotten to include it.

I went, I looked...
And for balance, I didn't find the site interesting...

What's more, it didn't display very well in NetSurf.

D.

--

Re: KYP West

In article <e7f2052156.ricp@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter <ricp@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
> On 22 Mar 2017 Tony Moore wrote:

> > On 22 Mar 2017, Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> >> This looks to a really interesting site

> > URL?

> > Tony

> I would hazard a guess that it might be http://www.kypwest.org.uk/

That's correct. Sorry, I fired the email off before I remembered that I
had forgotten to include it.

Re: KYP West

On 22 Mar 2017 Tony Moore wrote:

> On 22 Mar 2017, Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

>> This looks to a really interesting site

> URL?

> Tony

I would hazard a guess that it might be http://www.kypwest.org.uk/

--
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
Skype: minijem2 mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.

Re: KYP West

On 22 Mar 2017, Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> This looks to a really interesting site

URL?

Tony

KYP West

This looks to a really interesting site but unfortunately doesn't work
under NetSurf, which I guess is a Javascript problem. Are we very far off,
perhaps?

Re: Test Coverage

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:23:51 +0000, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> It would be a great area for a new contributor (or old ;-) to start
> with the codebase and add some tests while improving their familiarity
> with the NetsSurf codebase.

Adding tests is indeed an excellent way to get into a codebase. While
I am focussed quite strongly on another project until Debian Stretch
releases; I will be available on IRC to mentor if a prospective
developer wishes to take part and write some tests.

D.

--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69

Test Coverage

I have been attempting to improve the level of test coverage [1]
within NetsSurf recently. This work is mainly geared towards having
sufficient tests to implement cookie handling with some confidence of
correctness.

The current [2] cookie standards are very different to what we have
now and need this refactor to allow their use in the modern web with
javascript etc.

The test coverage is now minimally adequate at 88% of lines and 64% of
conditionals for code that is tested. However the amount of the
codebase tested outside of the utilities and url database is
effectively zero.

It would be a great area for a new contributor (or old ;-) to start
with the codebase and add some tests while improving their familiarity
with the NetsSurf codebase.

Tests are implemented as a series of simple programs using the c check
library. The existing tests should provide enough of a template but
feel free to ask questions here.

[1] http://ci.NetsSurf-browser.org/jenkins/view/Categorized/job/coverage-netssurf/
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265

--
Regards Vincent