In message <54F23DDE.5070907@macpcrepair.co.uk>
John Ballance <jwb@macpcrepair.co.uk> wrote:
> Failure building gcc4.1.2
>
> details below.
>
> I haven't yet found the solution to this.. Any thoughts?
I would guess some build requirement has not been met but the quoted
last bit of the log file is too short to confirm. Any chance to mail
me the zipped version of the full log file ?
John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home
John.Tytgat@aaug.net
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Sunday, 1 March 2015
Re: [gccsdk] patch needed in gcc4.7.1 build system
In message <54F233A1.8050604@macpcrepair.co.uk>
John Ballance <jwb@macpcrepair.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to build gcc 4.7.1 build system falls over (see below). There is
> a patch that can fix this (see
> https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2014-05/msg00032.html included below).
>
> Can/should that go back in, or do I just apply it locally to resolve.
> (basically there are 4 source files with changes of ptrdiff_t to
> std::ptrdiff_t, and inclusion of <cstddef>)
You can apply such local patches by placing them in the approriate
subdirectory under recipe/patches. On the other hand, this fix is
generaly useful as more and more people will start using gcc4.9 to build
GCCSDK so I've applied a copy of that patch as r6782.
If you remove buildstepsdir/src-ppl-copied you can restart your build
without a 'make clean'. The ppl sources will be unpacked again, this
patch will be applied and you no longer should have this problem (assuming
this patch is sufficient for ppl + gcc4.9).
Thanks,
John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home
John.Tytgat@aaug.net
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
John Ballance <jwb@macpcrepair.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to build gcc 4.7.1 build system falls over (see below). There is
> a patch that can fix this (see
> https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2014-05/msg00032.html included below).
>
> Can/should that go back in, or do I just apply it locally to resolve.
> (basically there are 4 source files with changes of ptrdiff_t to
> std::ptrdiff_t, and inclusion of <cstddef>)
You can apply such local patches by placing them in the approriate
subdirectory under recipe/patches. On the other hand, this fix is
generaly useful as more and more people will start using gcc4.9 to build
GCCSDK so I've applied a copy of that patch as r6782.
If you remove buildstepsdir/src-ppl-copied you can restart your build
without a 'make clean'. The ppl sources will be unpacked again, this
patch will be applied and you no longer should have this problem (assuming
this patch is sufficient for ppl + gcc4.9).
Thanks,
John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home
John.Tytgat@aaug.net
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu and Networking
In article <549d7962d2Lists@Torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <549d6d73dddave@triffid.co.uk>,
> Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> > Unfortunately ATM. I don't have the spare time to play with toy
> > computers as I'm a bit busy. ;-)
> My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
[Snip]
Etc, etc...
Unfortunately none of all that helps with my RPCEmu networking query,
which happened again five minutes ago.
?
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Richard Torrens (lists) <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <549d6d73dddave@triffid.co.uk>,
> Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> > Unfortunately ATM. I don't have the spare time to play with toy
> > computers as I'm a bit busy. ;-)
> My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
[Snip]
Etc, etc...
Unfortunately none of all that helps with my RPCEmu networking query,
which happened again five minutes ago.
?
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu and Networking
In article <b70d8b9d54.Bernard@bapfish.plus.com>,
Bernard Veasey <bernard@bapfish.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <549d7962d2Lists@Torrens.org.uk>
> "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> > My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
> > While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
> > 'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly
> > on the R-Pi.
> >
> > The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
> > faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
> I have used several R-Pi computers (B 256MB, B 512MB and B+ 512MB)
> since they first came out and I have not once had a single disc fault
> or corruption with any of them.
Interesting.
I had the original card from ROOL. It corrupted cpmpletely. They replaced
the card. Maybe that was a little better. So I got the board replaced. No
significant difference.
I have also tried doubling up power supplies. No detectable difference.
Often using DiscKnight to check a reported error - no fault is found. If
one is found, DK can repair it. It feels like a timing error.
So maybe the µSD cards ROoL supply are not fast enough...
> I have always used Integral SD cards
> if that has anything to do with it. An SD card like this:
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Integral-UltimaPro-16GB-Class-Memory/dp/B0062CEL6O
> I have had an occasional key on the keyboard not work - but that
> is supposed to be cured with the latest RC14 version of RISC OS for
> the R-Pi.
Yes, just noticed the new RC14 release. I have ordered a class 10 SD card
(same speed as your link) - a lot faster that the class 4 that ROOL say is
needed. We will see!
> Bernard
> --
> Contact Me - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/contactme/
> Web - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> Rpcemu mailing list
> Rpcemu@riscos.info
> http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Bernard Veasey <bernard@bapfish.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <549d7962d2Lists@Torrens.org.uk>
> "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> > My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
> > While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
> > 'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly
> > on the R-Pi.
> >
> > The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
> > faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
> I have used several R-Pi computers (B 256MB, B 512MB and B+ 512MB)
> since they first came out and I have not once had a single disc fault
> or corruption with any of them.
Interesting.
I had the original card from ROOL. It corrupted cpmpletely. They replaced
the card. Maybe that was a little better. So I got the board replaced. No
significant difference.
I have also tried doubling up power supplies. No detectable difference.
Often using DiscKnight to check a reported error - no fault is found. If
one is found, DK can repair it. It feels like a timing error.
So maybe the µSD cards ROoL supply are not fast enough...
> I have always used Integral SD cards
> if that has anything to do with it. An SD card like this:
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Integral-UltimaPro-16GB-Class-Memory/dp/B0062CEL6O
> I have had an occasional key on the keyboard not work - but that
> is supposed to be cured with the latest RC14 version of RISC OS for
> the R-Pi.
Yes, just noticed the new RC14 release. I have ordered a class 10 SD card
(same speed as your link) - a lot faster that the class 4 that ROOL say is
needed. We will see!
> Bernard
> --
> Contact Me - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/contactme/
> Web - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> Rpcemu mailing list
> Rpcemu@riscos.info
> http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu and Networking
In message <549d7962d2Lists@Torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
> While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
> 'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly
> on the R-Pi.
>
> The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
> faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
I have used several R-Pi computers (B 256MB, B 512MB and B+ 512MB)
since they first came out and I have not once had a single disc fault
or corruption with any of them. I have always used Integral SD cards
if that has anything to do with it. An SD card like this:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Integral-UltimaPro-16GB-Class-Memory/dp/B0062CEL6O
I have had an occasional key on the keyboard not work - but that
is supposed to be cured with the latest RC14 version of RISC OS for
the R-Pi.
Bernard
--
Contact Me - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/contactme/
Web - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
"Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
> My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
> While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
> 'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly
> on the R-Pi.
>
> The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
> faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
I have used several R-Pi computers (B 256MB, B 512MB and B+ 512MB)
since they first came out and I have not once had a single disc fault
or corruption with any of them. I have always used Integral SD cards
if that has anything to do with it. An SD card like this:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Integral-UltimaPro-16GB-Class-Memory/dp/B0062CEL6O
I have had an occasional key on the keyboard not work - but that
is supposed to be cured with the latest RC14 version of RISC OS for
the R-Pi.
Bernard
--
Contact Me - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/contactme/
Web - http://www.bapfish.org.uk/
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu and Networking
Hi Richard,
> While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
> 'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly on
> the R-Pi.
The Pi2B now has 1GiB RAM and four ARM cores, though RISC OS still only
uses one of course.
> The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent
> disk faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
RC14 has been recently released to support the Pi2B as well as all the
other Pi models. Previous was RC12. Amongst the many fixes is using
fast interrupts to handle USB to cure that erratic keyboard/mouse
handling.
https://www.riscosopen.org/news/articles/2015/02/28/raspberry-pi-release-rc14
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: [Rpcemu] RPCEmu and Networking
In article <549d6d73dddave@triffid.co.uk>,
Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> Unfortunately ATM. I don't have the spare time to play with toy computers
> as I'm a bit busy. ;-)
My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly on the
R-Pi.
The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> Unfortunately ATM. I don't have the spare time to play with toy computers
> as I'm a bit busy. ;-)
My Iyonix failed. I bought a B+.
While I agree there are problems on the R-Pi and it's no match for a
'proper' computer, networking is one thing that does work properly on the
R-Pi.
The problems are with erratic keybord/mouase handling, and frequent disk
faults reported when accessing its µSD card.
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
Rpcemu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)