On 28/12/2019 23:48, Chris Young wrote:
> Not working on AmigaOS 4/PPC, just fails to recognise them at all (once
> I'd remembered to disable my old WebP datatype).
I think the Amiga (and Atari) toolchain builds need to have libwebp
enabled in the SDK.
--
Michael Drake https://www.codethink.co.uk/
Monday, 30 December 2019
Sunday, 29 December 2019
Re: [Rpcemu] Startup question.
In article
<CAFWmK8yviiPz0_Lb=WmgYyzn_UWFwbad5+s+=VCayfG96x3kYg@mail.gmail.com>, J
Percival <perciv.js@gmail.com> wrote:
> The recompiler converts sections of ARM code as used by Acorn machines
> to the system's native code (x86 on PC) which are then executed directly
> which usually gives a speed boost compared to interpretation. The
> interpreter looks at each ARM instruction in turn and processes it
> without actually converting it. There are a few rare situations where
> the dynamic recompiler makes mistakes so it's basically a tradeoff
> between accuracy and speed. In general the recompiler works fine but if
> you run into problems, you can try the slower interpreter. You'll find
> recompiler/interpreter choices in many emulators for exactly this
> reason. The reason there's two different executables to choose between
> interpreter and recompiler is just an oddity specific to RPCEmu, most
> emulators just have the one executable and then let you configure it in
> the options.
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 07:47, Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> > RPCEmu 0.9.2 on Win 10 Pro 64bit.
> > Running RISC OS 6.20 and RISC OS 5.27
> >
> > I was recently asked by a shoulder over-looker...
> > What's the difference between "Recompiler.exe" and "Interpreter.exe"?
> > And immediately followed on with, "Why two different ways to Run
> > something"?
> >
> > I have absolutely no idea, so couldn't answer.
> >
> > Is there an answer to each of the above questions?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> >
Thanks for the illumination, appreciated.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
RPCEmu mailing list
RPCEmu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
<CAFWmK8yviiPz0_Lb=WmgYyzn_UWFwbad5+s+=VCayfG96x3kYg@mail.gmail.com>, J
Percival <perciv.js@gmail.com> wrote:
> The recompiler converts sections of ARM code as used by Acorn machines
> to the system's native code (x86 on PC) which are then executed directly
> which usually gives a speed boost compared to interpretation. The
> interpreter looks at each ARM instruction in turn and processes it
> without actually converting it. There are a few rare situations where
> the dynamic recompiler makes mistakes so it's basically a tradeoff
> between accuracy and speed. In general the recompiler works fine but if
> you run into problems, you can try the slower interpreter. You'll find
> recompiler/interpreter choices in many emulators for exactly this
> reason. The reason there's two different executables to choose between
> interpreter and recompiler is just an oddity specific to RPCEmu, most
> emulators just have the one executable and then let you configure it in
> the options.
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 07:47, Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> > RPCEmu 0.9.2 on Win 10 Pro 64bit.
> > Running RISC OS 6.20 and RISC OS 5.27
> >
> > I was recently asked by a shoulder over-looker...
> > What's the difference between "Recompiler.exe" and "Interpreter.exe"?
> > And immediately followed on with, "Why two different ways to Run
> > something"?
> >
> > I have absolutely no idea, so couldn't answer.
> >
> > Is there an answer to each of the above questions?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> >
Thanks for the illumination, appreciated.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
RPCEmu mailing list
RPCEmu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: [Rpcemu] Startup question.
The recompiler converts sections of ARM code as used by Acorn machines to the system's native code (x86 on PC) which are then executed directly which usually gives a speed boost compared to interpretation.
The interpreter looks at each ARM instruction in turn and processes it without actually converting it. There are a few rare situations where the dynamic recompiler makes mistakes so it's basically a tradeoff between accuracy and speed. In general the recompiler works fine but if you run into problems, you can try the slower interpreter. You'll find recompiler/interpreter choices in many emulators for exactly this reason.
The reason there's two different executables to choose between interpreter and recompiler is just an oddity specific to RPCEmu, most emulators just have the one executable and then let you configure it in the options.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 07:47, Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
RPCEmu 0.9.2 on Win 10 Pro 64bit.
Running RISC OS 6.20 and RISC OS 5.27
I was recently asked by a shoulder over-looker...
What's the difference between "Recompiler.exe" and "Interpreter.exe"?
And immediately followed on with, "Why two different ways to Run
something"?
I have absolutely no idea, so couldn't answer.
Is there an answer to each of the above questions?
Thanks
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
RPCEmu mailing list
RPCEmu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Saturday, 28 December 2019
[Rpcemu] Startup question.
RPCEmu 0.9.2 on Win 10 Pro 64bit.
Running RISC OS 6.20 and RISC OS 5.27
I was recently asked by a shoulder over-looker...
What's the difference between "Recompiler.exe" and "Interpreter.exe"?
And immediately followed on with, "Why two different ways to Run
something"?
I have absolutely no idea, so couldn't answer.
Is there an answer to each of the above questions?
Thanks
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
RPCEmu mailing list
RPCEmu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Running RISC OS 6.20 and RISC OS 5.27
I was recently asked by a shoulder over-looker...
What's the difference between "Recompiler.exe" and "Interpreter.exe"?
And immediately followed on with, "Why two different ways to Run
something"?
I have absolutely no idea, so couldn't answer.
Is there an answer to each of the above questions?
Thanks
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
_______________________________________________
RPCEmu mailing list
RPCEmu@riscos.info
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
Re: Please test webp image format
On 07/12/2019 13:49, Michael Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
Not working on AmigaOS 4/PPC, just fails to recognise them at all (once
I'd remembered to disable my old WebP datatype).
Chris
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
Not working on AmigaOS 4/PPC, just fails to recognise them at all (once
I'd remembered to disable my old WebP datatype).
Chris
Friday, 20 December 2019
Re: NetSurf Illegal Window Handle (RISC OS)
In message <mpro.q2tm1q008157j00kj.mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk>
Frederick Bambrough <mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>I started a thread on the RISC OS open Forum at
>
>https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/14945?page=1#posts-97826
>
>for more details. To sum;
>
>On closing windows in NetSurf choices/configuration I'm seeing the error,
>'An unexpected error occurred: Illegal window handle'. It only happens on
>alternate config categories and on first look doesn't appear to do harm.
>
>It's on RISC OS 5.27 (19-12-19) ROM, NetSurf 3.10(DEV CI #4956).
>
>To summarise the thread, it's due to the latest version of RISC OS
>improved reporting of errors, showing this one up. It's been confirmed by
>others and is said to be related to changes in that ROM relating to
>clipboard caret/task fixes.
>
>
>NetSurf log extract;
>
>(9.520000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1654
>ro_gui_wimp_event_get_window: Creating structure for window 0x20481e39
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/dialog.c:378 ro_gui_dialog_close:
>xwimp_set_caret_position: 0x288: Illegal window handle
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/gui.c:2112 ro_warn_user: WimpError Illegal
>window handle
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1112
>ro_gui_wimp_event_close_window: Close event received for window 0x20481e39
>
>
>Anything else - best to follow the ROOL forum thread. I'm not qualified
>:-)
I've reported this as Mantis bug 2728.
David
Frederick Bambrough <mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>I started a thread on the RISC OS open Forum at
>
>https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/14945?page=1#posts-97826
>
>for more details. To sum;
>
>On closing windows in NetSurf choices/configuration I'm seeing the error,
>'An unexpected error occurred: Illegal window handle'. It only happens on
>alternate config categories and on first look doesn't appear to do harm.
>
>It's on RISC OS 5.27 (19-12-19) ROM, NetSurf 3.10(DEV CI #4956).
>
>To summarise the thread, it's due to the latest version of RISC OS
>improved reporting of errors, showing this one up. It's been confirmed by
>others and is said to be related to changes in that ROM relating to
>clipboard caret/task fixes.
>
>
>NetSurf log extract;
>
>(9.520000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1654
>ro_gui_wimp_event_get_window: Creating structure for window 0x20481e39
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/dialog.c:378 ro_gui_dialog_close:
>xwimp_set_caret_position: 0x288: Illegal window handle
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/gui.c:2112 ro_warn_user: WimpError Illegal
>window handle
>
>(10.850000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1112
>ro_gui_wimp_event_close_window: Close event received for window 0x20481e39
>
>
>Anything else - best to follow the ROOL forum thread. I'm not qualified
>:-)
I've reported this as Mantis bug 2728.
David
NetSurf Illegal Window Handle (RISC OS)
I started a thread on the RISC OS open Forum at
https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/14945?page=1#posts-97826
for more details. To sum;
On closing windows in NetSurf choices/configuration I'm seeing the error,
'An unexpected error occurred: Illegal window handle'. It only happens on
alternate config categories and on first look doesn't appear to do harm.
It's on RISC OS 5.27 (19-12-19) ROM, NetSurf 3.10(DEV CI #4956).
To summarise the thread, it's due to the latest version of RISC OS
improved reporting of errors, showing this one up. It's been confirmed by
others and is said to be related to changes in that ROM relating to
clipboard caret/task fixes.
NetSurf log extract;
(9.520000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1654
ro_gui_wimp_event_get_window: Creating structure for window 0x20481e39
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/dialog.c:378 ro_gui_dialog_close:
xwimp_set_caret_position: 0x288: Illegal window handle
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/gui.c:2112 ro_warn_user: WimpError Illegal
window handle
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1112
ro_gui_wimp_event_close_window: Close event received for window 0x20481e39
Anything else - best to follow the ROOL forum thread. I'm not qualified
:-)
https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/14945?page=1#posts-97826
for more details. To sum;
On closing windows in NetSurf choices/configuration I'm seeing the error,
'An unexpected error occurred: Illegal window handle'. It only happens on
alternate config categories and on first look doesn't appear to do harm.
It's on RISC OS 5.27 (19-12-19) ROM, NetSurf 3.10(DEV CI #4956).
To summarise the thread, it's due to the latest version of RISC OS
improved reporting of errors, showing this one up. It's been confirmed by
others and is said to be related to changes in that ROM relating to
clipboard caret/task fixes.
NetSurf log extract;
(9.520000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1654
ro_gui_wimp_event_get_window: Creating structure for window 0x20481e39
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/dialog.c:378 ro_gui_dialog_close:
xwimp_set_caret_position: 0x288: Illegal window handle
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/gui.c:2112 ro_warn_user: WimpError Illegal
window handle
(10.850000) frontends/riscos/wimp_event.c:1112
ro_gui_wimp_event_close_window: Close event received for window 0x20481e39
Anything else - best to follow the ROOL forum thread. I'm not qualified
:-)
Tuesday, 10 December 2019
Re: Please test webp image format
>
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
Struggling to test this with Atari build 4950 because 9 times
out of 10 it says:
FetchErrorTitle
An error occurred when connecting to developers.google.com
Failure when receiving data from the peer
Peter
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
Struggling to test this with Atari build 4950 because 9 times
out of 10 it says:
FetchErrorTitle
An error occurred when connecting to developers.google.com
Failure when receiving data from the peer
Peter
Monday, 9 December 2019
Re: Please test webp image format
On 7 Dec, tlsa@netsurf-browser.org typed:
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
and Wikipedia example WebP file at:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/Vulphere_WebP_OTAGROOVE_demonstration_2.webp
with RISC OS NetSurf 3.10 (Dev CI #4951) some anomalies:
RISC OS 5.25 ARMX6
Displayed both test page and WebP file(*) okay once. Then some unexplained
waits with hourglass. Then no further ability to display the WenP data,
even after reloading NetSurf.
(*) by dragging in the saved file despite its being typed Data. Has a RISC
OS file type been assigned?
RISC OS 5.24 Iyonix
Displayed test page repeatedly okay. Did not display the file.
--
Bernard
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
and Wikipedia example WebP file at:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/Vulphere_WebP_OTAGROOVE_demonstration_2.webp
with RISC OS NetSurf 3.10 (Dev CI #4951) some anomalies:
RISC OS 5.25 ARMX6
Displayed both test page and WebP file(*) okay once. Then some unexplained
waits with hourglass. Then no further ability to display the WenP data,
even after reloading NetSurf.
(*) by dragging in the saved file despite its being typed Data. Has a RISC
OS file type been assigned?
RISC OS 5.24 Iyonix
Displayed test page repeatedly okay. Did not display the file.
--
Bernard
Re: Please test webp image format
On 7 Dec, tlsa@netsurf-browser.org typed:
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Don't you mean 'Continuous' on that page's <h1>...</h1> ?
--
Bernard
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Don't you mean 'Continuous' on that page's <h1>...</h1> ?
--
Bernard
Re: Please test webp image format
In article <e801691f58.Brian@bhowlett.plus.net>, Brian Howlett
<brian.groups@brianhowlett.me.uk> wrote:
> On 8 Dec, David Higton wrote:
> > In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> > Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> >> our CI should now have webp support.
> >>
> >> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> >> platforms visit
> >>
> >> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >>
> >> and let us know if it's working?
> > Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The
> > pairs of photos look identical to me.
> I had the wrong colours showing on this TiMachine yesterday, but just
> now with CI#4950 it works correctly.
Ditto Pi 3B+ RO 5.24
All looking splendid now. Good job.
--
Tim Hill
Webmaster, www.timil.com
websites : php : RISC OS
<brian.groups@brianhowlett.me.uk> wrote:
> On 8 Dec, David Higton wrote:
> > In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> > Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> >> our CI should now have webp support.
> >>
> >> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> >> platforms visit
> >>
> >> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >>
> >> and let us know if it's working?
> > Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The
> > pairs of photos look identical to me.
> I had the wrong colours showing on this TiMachine yesterday, but just
> now with CI#4950 it works correctly.
Ditto Pi 3B+ RO 5.24
All looking splendid now. Good job.
--
Tim Hill
Webmaster, www.timil.com
websites : php : RISC OS
Sunday, 8 December 2019
Re: Please test webp image format
On 8 Dec, David Higton wrote:
> In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our CI
>> should now have webp support.
>>
>> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other platforms
>> visit
>>
>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>> and let us know if it's working?
> Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The pairs
> of photos look identical to me.
I had the wrong colours showing on this TiMachine yesterday, but just now
with CI#4950 it works correctly.
--
Brian Howlett
-----------------------------------------------------
I stayed up all night playing poker with Tarot cards.
I got a full house, and four people died.
> In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our CI
>> should now have webp support.
>>
>> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other platforms
>> visit
>>
>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>> and let us know if it's working?
> Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The pairs
> of photos look identical to me.
I had the wrong colours showing on this TiMachine yesterday, but just now
with CI#4950 it works correctly.
--
Brian Howlett
-----------------------------------------------------
I stayed up all night playing poker with Tarot cards.
I got a full house, and four people died.
Re: Please test webp image format
On 8 Dec 2019 Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears@onetel.com> wrote:
> In message <7971b81e58.thebears@thebears.onetel.com>
> Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears@onetel.com> wrote:
>> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
>> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
>>>> our CI should now have webp support.
>>>
>>>> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
>>>> platforms visit
>>>
>>>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>>
>>>> and let us know if it's working?
>>>
>>>
>>>> The CI builds are available from here:
>>>
>>>> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>>>
>>> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>>
>> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>>
>> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
>> colour.)
>>
>> TTFN
> Sorted with #4950. :-)
So it is!
> Thanks
Thanks from me too.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
> In message <7971b81e58.thebears@thebears.onetel.com>
> Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears@onetel.com> wrote:
>> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
>> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
>>>> our CI should now have webp support.
>>>
>>>> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
>>>> platforms visit
>>>
>>>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>>
>>>> and let us know if it's working?
>>>
>>>
>>>> The CI builds are available from here:
>>>
>>>> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>>>
>>> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>>
>> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>>
>> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
>> colour.)
>>
>> TTFN
> Sorted with #4950. :-)
So it is!
> Thanks
Thanks from me too.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
Re: Please test webp image format
In message <7971b81e58.thebears@thebears.onetel.com>
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears@onetel.com> wrote:
> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > > our CI should now have webp support.
> >
> > > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > > platforms visit
> >
> > > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >
> > > and let us know if it's working?
> >
> >
> > > The CI builds are available from here:
> >
> > > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> >
> > Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>
> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
> colour.)
>
> TTFN
Sorted with #4950. :-)
Thanks
TTFN
--
Geoff.
Using Elesar Titanium.
Isn't that a pip?
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears@onetel.com> wrote:
> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > > our CI should now have webp support.
> >
> > > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > > platforms visit
> >
> > > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >
> > > and let us know if it's working?
> >
> >
> > > The CI builds are available from here:
> >
> > > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> >
> > Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>
> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
> colour.)
>
> TTFN
Sorted with #4950. :-)
Thanks
TTFN
--
Geoff.
Using Elesar Titanium.
Isn't that a pip?
Re: Please test webp image format
In message <0481301f58.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
> In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our
> > CI should now have webp support.
> >
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit
> >
> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >
> > and let us know if it's working?
>
> Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The
> pairs of photos look identical to me.
To confirm, this version of NetSurf is now showing identical colours on my
BB -xM, RISC OS 5.27.
--
Fred
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
> In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our
> > CI should now have webp support.
> >
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit
> >
> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >
> > and let us know if it's working?
>
> Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The
> pairs of photos look identical to me.
To confirm, this version of NetSurf is now showing identical colours on my
BB -xM, RISC OS 5.27.
--
Fred
Re: Please test webp image format
In article <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>,
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
Dev CI #4947 fixes the colour swapping for me on my original Pi2 and for
David Pitt, who reported elsewhere:
> Oh dear I can't now get to the Netsurf mailing list with Plusnet's
> webmail.
> I only wanted to report that webp image colours are OK now with #4947.
> Tested on Titanium and RPi3B+.
John
--
| John Williams
| johnrw@ukgateway.net
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
Dev CI #4947 fixes the colour swapping for me on my original Pi2 and for
David Pitt, who reported elsewhere:
> Oh dear I can't now get to the Netsurf mailing list with Plusnet's
> webmail.
> I only wanted to report that webp image colours are OK now with #4947.
> Tested on Titanium and RPi3B+.
John
--
| John Williams
| johnrw@ukgateway.net
Re: Please test webp image format
In message <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our CI
> should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other platforms
> visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The pairs
of photos look identical to me.
David
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from our CI
> should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other platforms
> visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
Working correctly here: BBxM, RO 5.27 (28-Oct-19), NS CI#4947. The pairs
of photos look identical to me.
David
Re: Please test webp image format
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:48:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: Peter Slegg <pslegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Please test webp image format
To: <netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org>
Message-ID: <00771621.0419b4904ec6@smtp.freeola.net>
On , netsurf-users-request@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
>>
>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>
>Atari build 4946. The link to the fire breathing page shows an
>image without any reversed colours.
>
>
>Peter
I should correct myself.
The jpeg image is being shown but the webp image is not shown at all.
I did a check with firefox (the webp image quality is terrible).
Peter
From: Peter Slegg <pslegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Please test webp image format
To: <netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org>
Message-ID: <00771621.0419b4904ec6@smtp.freeola.net>
On , netsurf-users-request@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
>>
>> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>
>Atari build 4946. The link to the fire breathing page shows an
>image without any reversed colours.
>
>
>Peter
I should correct myself.
The jpeg image is being shown but the webp image is not shown at all.
I did a check with firefox (the webp image quality is terrible).
Peter
Re: Please test webp image format
Here Atari Coldfire build 4945 doesnt show webp pictures at all.
Chers,
Vido
V V ned., 8. dec. 2019 ob 00:48 je oseba Peter Slegg <pslegg@scubadivers.co.uk> napisala:
On , netsurf-users-request@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 13:49:50 +0000
> From: Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org>
> Subject: Please test webp image format
> To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
> Message-ID: <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
>
>
> The CI builds are available from here:
>
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
Atari build 4946. The link to the fire breathing page shows an
image without any reversed colours.
Peter
Saturday, 7 December 2019
Re: Please test webp image format
On , netsurf-users-request@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 13:49:50 +0000
> From: Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org>
> Subject: Please test webp image format
> To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
> Message-ID: <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
>
>
> The CI builds are available from here:
>
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
Atari build 4946. The link to the fire breathing page shows an
image without any reversed colours.
Peter
> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 13:49:50 +0000
> From: Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org>
> Subject: Please test webp image format
> To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
> Message-ID: <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>
> Hello,
>
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
>
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
>
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> and let us know if it's working?
>
>
> The CI builds are available from here:
>
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
Atari build 4946. The link to the fire breathing page shows an
image without any reversed colours.
Peter
Re: Please test webp image format
On 7 Dec 2019 cj <chris@chris-johnson.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net>,
> David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
>> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
>> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
> The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
> OS rgb/bgr reversal.
That's odd, as it doesn't seem to happen here on this ARMX6. Hang on a
minute though. On the first pair of images, the water in the fjord is blue
in one image and orange in the second. Similarly, the sky behind the tree
is blue in one image and orange in the other.
This is way beyond my understanding.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
> In article <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net>,
> David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
>> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
>> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
> The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
> OS rgb/bgr reversal.
That's odd, as it doesn't seem to happen here on this ARMX6. Hang on a
minute though. On the first pair of images, the water in the fjord is blue
in one image and orange in the second. Similarly, the sky behind the tree
is blue in one image and orange in the other.
This is way beyond my understanding.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
Re: Please test webp image format
In article <514e111f-108b-c4aa-b35b-081f9544d844@codethink.co.uk>,
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> and let us know if it's working?
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> Cheers,
> Michael
No colour problem here RISC OS 6.20 VRPC-DL NetSurf 3.10 (Dev C1 #4945)
C16M Screen colours.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> and let us know if it's working?
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> Cheers,
> Michael
No colour problem here RISC OS 6.20 VRPC-DL NetSurf 3.10 (Dev C1 #4945)
C16M Screen colours.
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
Re: Please test webp image format
> In article <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net>,
> David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
>> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
>> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
cj wrote on 7 Dec:
> The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
> OS rgb/bgr reversal.a
Yes, same. Here on ArmX6 (Ro 5.25, RComp 2018-apr) the fire shown in the
last photo looks quite surreal when coloured cyan.
Welcome news, though, ye Netsurf team! Only yesterday I was frustrated
when somebody shared me a photo that arrived in Google's newfangled WebP
format.
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
> David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
>> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
>> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
cj wrote on 7 Dec:
> The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
> OS rgb/bgr reversal.a
Yes, same. Here on ArmX6 (Ro 5.25, RComp 2018-apr) the fire shown in the
last photo looks quite surreal when coloured cyan.
Welcome news, though, ye Netsurf team! Only yesterday I was frustrated
when somebody shared me a photo that arrived in Google's newfangled WebP
format.
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
Re: Please test webp image format
In article <mpro.q25l5l005dtlr00cj.mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk>, Frederick
Bambrough <mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net> David Pitt
> <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 2019-12-07 16:34, Geoffrey Baxendale wrote:
> > > In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> Peter Young
> > > <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > > > > Hello,
[Snip]
> > >>
> > > Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
> > >
> > > (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> > > type colour.)
> >
> > Not quite right here either.
> >
> > Using NetSurf 4945.
> >
> > The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5
> > on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as
> > blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
> >
> > (Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
> Same colour issue here on Beagleboard -xM, RISC OS 5.27(01-Dec-19) &
> NetSurf CI #4945
I can confirm same colour issues on Pi3B+ with RO 5.24
--
Tim Hill
Webmaster, www.timil.com
websites : php : RISC OS
Bambrough <mlist@ypical.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net> David Pitt
> <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 2019-12-07 16:34, Geoffrey Baxendale wrote:
> > > In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> Peter Young
> > > <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > > > > Hello,
[Snip]
> > >>
> > > Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
> > >
> > > (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> > > type colour.)
> >
> > Not quite right here either.
> >
> > Using NetSurf 4945.
> >
> > The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5
> > on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as
> > blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
> >
> > (Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
> Same colour issue here on Beagleboard -xM, RISC OS 5.27(01-Dec-19) &
> NetSurf CI #4945
I can confirm same colour issues on Pi3B+ with RO 5.24
--
Tim Hill
Webmaster, www.timil.com
websites : php : RISC OS
Re: Please test webp image format
In article <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net>,
David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
OS rgb/bgr reversal.
--
Chris Johnson
Edinburgh
David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS
> 5 on the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear
> as blue and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
The colours are reversed on iMX6 as well, so it is not limited to the
OS rgb/bgr reversal.
--
Chris Johnson
Edinburgh
Re: Please test webp image format
In message <1c52658a2840684728dce5b1fa248d21@imap.plus.net>
David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2019-12-07 16:34, Geoffrey Baxendale wrote:
> > In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> > Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >>
> > > > Hello,
> >>
> > > > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > > > our CI should now have webp support.
> >>
> > > > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > > > platforms visit
> >>
> >> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >>
> > > > and let us know if it's working?
> >>
> >>
> > > > The CI builds are available from here:
> >>
> >> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> >>
> > > Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
> >>
> > > Best wishes,
> >>
> > > Peter.
> >>
> > Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
> >
> > (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> > type colour.)
>
> Not quite right here either.
>
> Using NetSurf 4945.
>
> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5 on
> the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as blue
> and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
>
> (Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
Same colour issue here on Beagleboard -xM, RISC OS 5.27(01-Dec-19) &
NetSurf CI #4945
David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2019-12-07 16:34, Geoffrey Baxendale wrote:
> > In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> > Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> >>
> > > > Hello,
> >>
> > > > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > > > our CI should now have webp support.
> >>
> > > > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > > > platforms visit
> >>
> >> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> >>
> > > > and let us know if it's working?
> >>
> >>
> > > > The CI builds are available from here:
> >>
> >> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
> >>
> > > Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
> >>
> > > Best wishes,
> >>
> > > Peter.
> >>
> > Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
> >
> > (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> > type colour.)
>
> Not quite right here either.
>
> Using NetSurf 4945.
>
> The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5 on
> the Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as blue
> and vice versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
>
> (Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
Same colour issue here on Beagleboard -xM, RISC OS 5.27(01-Dec-19) &
NetSurf CI #4945
Re: Please test webp image format
On 2019-12-07 16:34, Geoffrey Baxendale wrote:
> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
>> > our CI should now have webp support.
>>
>> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
>> > platforms visit
>>
>> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>> > and let us know if it's working?
>>
>>
>> > The CI builds are available from here:
>>
>> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>>
>> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Peter.
>>
> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>
> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> type
> colour.)
Not quite right here either.
Using NetSurf 4945.
The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5 on
the
Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as blue and
vice
versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
(Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
--
David Pitt
> In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
>> > our CI should now have webp support.
>>
>> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
>> > platforms visit
>>
>> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>>
>> > and let us know if it's working?
>>
>>
>> > The CI builds are available from here:
>>
>> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>>
>> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Peter.
>>
> Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
>
> (colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan
> type
> colour.)
Not quite right here either.
Using NetSurf 4945.
The bad news is that there is colour transposition seen on RISC OS 5 on
the
Titaniun and RPi3B+, and OS4.02 on RPCEmu. Yellows appear as blue and
vice
versa. Red and blue transposed, probably.
(Having to send via webmail, Plusnet won't let me reply by email.)
--
David Pitt
Re: Please test webp image format
In message <d467b11e58.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > our CI should now have webp support.
>
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit
>
> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> > and let us know if it's working?
>
>
> > The CI builds are available from here:
>
> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>
> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Peter.
>
Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
(colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
colour.)
TTFN
--
Geoff. Baxendale, Darwen, Lancashire.
Using Elesar Titanium.
Oxymoron of the day: "Almost Exactly"
Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> > our CI should now have webp support.
>
> > So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> > platforms visit
>
> > https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
>
> > and let us know if it's working?
>
>
> > The CI builds are available from here:
>
> > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
>
> Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Peter.
>
Not here. (4945, RISC OS 5,27 on Titanium.)
(colours are wrong. Blue is orange, orange is blue, green is a cyan type
colour.)
TTFN
--
Geoff. Baxendale, Darwen, Lancashire.
Using Elesar Titanium.
Oxymoron of the day: "Almost Exactly"
Re: Please test webp image format
On 7 Dec 2019 Michael Drake <tlsa@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> and let us know if it's working?
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
> Hello,
> Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
> our CI should now have webp support.
> So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
> platforms visit
> https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
> and let us know if it's working?
> The CI builds are available from here:
> https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Working well here with RISC OS, Dev CI#4945. Many thanks.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Hg) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
Please test webp image format
Hello,
Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
our CI should now have webp support.
So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
platforms visit
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
and let us know if it's working?
The CI builds are available from here:
https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Cheers,
Michael
Recently we added the webp library to our SDK. NetSurf Builds from
our CI should now have webp support.
So far we've only tested on Linux. Please could users of other
platforms visit
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1
and let us know if it's working?
The CI builds are available from here:
https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/
Cheers,
Michael
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)